Collaborative Inquiry
Students treat opponents as partners in truth-seeking, not targets to defeat.
A National Ethics Dialogue Program
A rendition of the National High School Ethics Bowl for Chinese students, centered on collaborative inquiry rather than debate victory.
CHSEB adapts the spirit of NHSEB to Chinese school communities by emphasizing careful ethical reasoning, intellectual humility, and respectful public dialogue across differences.
Students treat opponents as partners in truth-seeking, not targets to defeat.
Arguments are evaluated by clarity, fairness, and whether diverse audiences can examine them.
Teams explore policy and personal ethics while considering long-term social consequences.
Inspired by Michael Sandel's public philosophy and Jurgen Habermas's discourse ethics, CHSEB trains students to justify claims in terms that others can examine, challenge, and refine.
Teams test values in common civic language, asking what justice, responsibility, and dignity require in specific cases.
Rounds reward reciprocal reasoning, active listening, and openness to revision when better reasons emerge.
A shared set of real-world ethics cases is distributed to all participating teams.
Schools enter moderated and scored rounds focused on analysis, response quality, and engagement.
Top teams gather for semifinal and final rounds, followed by a public showcase panel.
See participation pathways for teams, judges, and schools, then send a registration inquiry.
Download bilingual rulebook and casebook materials for classroom practice and tournament prep.
Explore an interactive map of moral cognitivism and non-cognitivism with key grounding disputes.
Compare consequentialism, deontology, contractualism, virtue ethics, and major thought experiments.
Join always-open topic rooms for metaethics, normative ethics, practical ethics, and more.
Apply to help run competitions or serve as a philosophy-focused judge.
CHSEB supports multilingual dialogue and rigorous ethical thinking for a changing civic landscape.
View Full Competition Structure